USNG vs. SWAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNG is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. USNG is actively managed, while SWAN is passively managed. Over the past year, USNG returned 40.50% vs 17.67% for SWAN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SWAN.

Performance

USNG vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than SWAN's 5.21% return.

USNG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 31.42%
• 6M: 28.41%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SWAN

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 4.34%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNG vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	31.42%	10.81%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	5.21%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and SWAN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025	0.21

USNG vs. SWAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USNG	SWAN
Energy	78.0%	3.5%
Industrials	13.8%	8.3%
Utilities	5.0%	2.4%
Financial Services	1.8%	11.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%
Communication Services	-	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Healthcare	-	8.5%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	35.6%

Return for Risk

USNG vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 80
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 54
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNG vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USNG	SWAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.89	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	2.71	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.97	2.52	+3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.70	9.93	+9.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USNG vs. SWAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SWAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNG and SWAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USNG	SWAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.89	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.66	0.58	+2.09

Drawdowns

USNG vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, smaller than the maximum SWAN drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and SWAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	SWAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-31.04%	+24.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.82%	-7.05%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-0.61%	-3.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-8.88%	+7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	1.78%	+0.29%

Volatility

USNG vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) at 3.48%. This indicates that USNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNG	SWAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	3.48%	+2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	7.28%	+5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.52%	9.39%	+7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	11.33%	+5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	12.47%	+4.08%

USNG vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNG vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than SWAN's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.79%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.13%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNG and SWAN in my portfolio?

USNG and SWAN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNG or SWAN?

USNG has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to SWAN (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNG dropped -6.82% vs SWAN's -31.04%.

Which ETF is better, USNG or SWAN?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 40.50% vs 17.67% for SWAN. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USNG or SWAN?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 40.50% return vs 17.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNG or SWAN?

SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNG or SWAN?

SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.13% for USNG.

What is the main difference between USNG and SWAN?

USNG is categorized as Energy Equities, while SWAN is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.49% for SWAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.