USNG vs. PBOG
USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. USNG is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
USNG vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 34.67% return, which is significantly higher than PBOG's 17.45% return.
USNG
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 34.67%
- 6M
- 34.92%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- 17.45%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USNG vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF | 34.67% | 0.84% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 17.45% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between USNG and PBOG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USNG vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
USNG
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USNG vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USNG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USNG vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, smaller than the maximum PBOG drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USNG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -17.22% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -17.22% | +15.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -3.95% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
USNG vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USNG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 24.10% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 24.10% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 24.10% | -7.48% |
USNG vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
USNG vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than PBOG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.15% | 0.17% |
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF | 1.10% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USNG and PBOG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.
USNG has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.15% for PBOG.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for USNG and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer