USNG vs. FTSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USNG is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, USNG returned 40.50% vs 4.31% for FTSD. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. USNG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.

Performance

USNG vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNG achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return.

USNG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 31.42%
• 6M: 28.41%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTSD

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 2.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNG vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	31.42%	10.81%
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF	0.80%	3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between USNG and FTSD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025	-0.22

Return for Risk

USNG vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 80
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FTSD

FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 95
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNG vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USNG	FTSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	3.30	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	5.27	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.69	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.97	9.59	-3.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.70	38.36	-18.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USNG vs. FTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FTSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNG and FTSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USNG	FTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	3.30	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.66	1.04	+1.62

Drawdowns

USNG vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNG drawdown since its inception was -6.82%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNG and FTSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNG	FTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-5.32%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.82%	-0.45%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-0.12%	-3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-0.60%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	0.11%	+1.96%

Volatility

USNG vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that USNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNG	FTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	0.51%	+5.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	1.03%	+11.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.52%	1.31%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	1.85%	+14.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	1.79%	+14.76%

USNG vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNG vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

USNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF	4.50%	4.67%	4.75%	4.14%	1.73%	1.01%	1.54%	2.90%	2.63%	2.24%	1.92%	1.52%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.13%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNG and FTSD in my portfolio?

USNG and FTSD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNG or FTSD?

USNG has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNG dropped -6.82% vs FTSD's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, USNG or FTSD?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 40.50% vs 4.31% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USNG or FTSD?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 40.50% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USNG or FTSD?

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USNG or FTSD?

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.13% for USNG.

What is the main difference between USNG and FTSD?

USNG is categorized as Energy Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for USNG and 0.25% for FTSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.