USML.L vs. VBR
USML.L (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USML.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USML.L returned 5.94%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for VBR. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USML.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
USML.L vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USML.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 12.51% return.
USML.L
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
VBR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
USML.L vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USML.L Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A | 15.40% | 6.56% | 7.78% | 17.52% | -15.95% | 26.49% | 11.11% | 5.73% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.51% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between USML.L and VBR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between USML.L and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
USML.L vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USML.L
VBR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
USML.L
VBR
Industrials
USML.L
VBR
Technology
USML.L
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
USML.L
VBR
Healthcare
USML.L
VBR
Real Estate
USML.L
VBR
Energy
USML.L
VBR
Basic Materials
USML.L
VBR
Communication Services
USML.L
VBR
Consumer Defensive
USML.L
VBR
Utilities
USML.L
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USML.L vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
USML.L
VBR
USML.L vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USML.L | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.11 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | 10.96 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USML.L | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.82 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.41 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
USML.L vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML.L drawdown since its inception was -42.69%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML.L and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USML.L | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.69% | -61.98% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -8.85% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | -24.19% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -24.19% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -8.27% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.50% | +0.27% |
Volatility
USML.L vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.89%. This indicates that USML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USML.L | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 3.89% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 10.47% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 15.14% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 19.77% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 21.73% | +2.09% |
USML.L vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USML.L vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
USML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USML.L Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USML.L and VBR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USML.L.
USML.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. USML.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USML.L and 0.05% for VBR.
Find the right allocation for USML.L and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer