PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USML.L vs. AVSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USML.L vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USML.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than AVSC's 18.57% return.


USML.L

1D
1.05%
1M
1.79%
YTD
15.40%
6M
15.62%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*

AVSC

1D
1.47%
1M
1.49%
YTD
18.57%
6M
17.84%
1Y
41.11%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USML.L vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USML.L
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A
15.40%6.56%7.78%17.52%-16.12%
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
18.57%9.42%7.75%19.68%-11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between USML.L and AVSC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2022

0.65

The correlation between USML.L and AVSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

USML.L vs. AVSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USML.L
AVSC

Financial Services

16.9%
22.4%

Industrials

15.5%
13.0%

Technology

15.5%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
14.9%

Healthcare

11.0%
11.5%

Real Estate

7.7%
0.9%

Energy

5.9%
9.5%

Basic Materials

5.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

USML.L
16.9%
AVSC
22.4%

Industrials

USML.L
15.5%
AVSC
13.0%

Technology

USML.L
15.5%
AVSC
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

USML.L
13.4%
AVSC
14.9%

Healthcare

USML.L
11.0%
AVSC
11.5%

Real Estate

USML.L
7.7%
AVSC
0.9%

Energy

USML.L
5.9%
AVSC
9.5%

Basic Materials

USML.L
5.1%
AVSC
5.5%

Communication Services

USML.L
3.6%
AVSC
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

USML.L
3.5%
AVSC
4.8%

Utilities

USML.L
2.0%
AVSC
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USML.L vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USML.L
USML.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
USML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
USML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSC
AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USML.L vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USML.LAVSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

5.23

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

16.26

-4.29

USML.L vs. AVSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USML.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the AVSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USML.L and AVSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USML.LAVSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.28

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.42

-0.02

Drawdowns

USML.L vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USML.L drawdown since its inception was -42.69%, which is greater than AVSC's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML.L and AVSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USML.LAVSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.69%

-28.40%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-7.89%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-28.40%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-7.36%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.54%

+0.23%

Volatility

USML.L vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) at 4.50%. This indicates that USML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USML.LAVSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.50%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

11.78%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

18.09%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

22.34%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.82%

22.34%

+1.48%

USML.L vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

USML.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USML.L vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison

USML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
0.91%1.16%1.17%1.42%1.10%
USML.L
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USML.L and AVSC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USML.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USML.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVSC.

USML.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVSC is Small Cap Value Equities. USML.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while AVSC tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USML.L and 0.25% for AVSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USML.L and AVSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer