USMF vs. QTUM
USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMF returned 8.31%/yr vs 29.16%/yr for QTUM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
USMF vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.56% return.
USMF
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 53.56%
- 6M
- 53.19%
- 1Y
- 94.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 29.16%
- 10Y*
- —
USMF vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 6.65% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -14.87% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.56% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and QTUM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between USMF and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMF vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMF
QTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
USMF
QTUM
Financial Services
USMF
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
USMF
QTUM
Communication Services
USMF
QTUM
Healthcare
USMF
QTUM
Industrials
USMF
QTUM
Energy
USMF
QTUM
-
Consumer Defensive
USMF
QTUM
-
Real Estate
USMF
QTUM
-
Utilities
USMF
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
USMF
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
QTUM
USMF vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.51 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 6.20 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 22.43 | -17.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMF vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -38.45% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -15.26% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -25.39% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -38.45% | +20.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -8.24% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 4.21% | -2.04% |
Volatility
USMF vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is 4.10%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that USMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 14.65% | -10.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 23.48% | -15.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 28.64% | -17.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 27.06% | -12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 27.43% | -10.46% |
USMF vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMF vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMF and QTUM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to USMF (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.16% vs 8.31% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.16% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
USMF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMF and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer