USMF vs. DEUS
USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index while DEUS tracks the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMF returned 7.47%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for DEUS. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DEUS.
Performance
USMF vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 15.73% return.
USMF
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
DEUS
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $638.57K | $826.95K | $989.73K | |
| $1.09M | $1.05M | $1.76M |
USMF vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.49% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 15.73% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | -11.18% | 26.31% | 8.81% | 28.80% | -9.16% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and DEUS is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between USMF and DEUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMF vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMF
DEUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USMF
DEUS
Financial Services
USMF
DEUS
Consumer Cyclical
USMF
DEUS
Communication Services
USMF
DEUS
Industrials
USMF
DEUS
Healthcare
USMF
DEUS
Consumer Defensive
USMF
DEUS
Energy
USMF
DEUS
Utilities
USMF
DEUS
Real Estate
USMF
DEUS
Basic Materials
USMF
DEUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
DEUS
USMF vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMF | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.19 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 12.26 | -8.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMF vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum DEUS drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and DEUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -40.47% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.83% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -16.69% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -20.89% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -1.01% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -4.28% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.77% | +0.35% |
Volatility
USMF vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 3.05%. This indicates that USMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.05% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 8.23% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 11.14% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.49% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.95% | -1.00% |
USMF vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMF vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than DEUS's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.38% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.31% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMF and DEUS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMF has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DEUS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs DEUS's -40.47%.
On 5-year performance, DEUS leads with 10.01% vs 7.47% for USMF. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for USMF.
DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.31% for USMF.
USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.17% for DEUS.
DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMF and DEUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer