USLV.L vs. SPXP.L
USLV.L (SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - USLV.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index while SPXP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L returned 8.39%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USLV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USLV.L is traded in GBP, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 8.39%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
USLV.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLV.L SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.11% | -2.67% | 15.49% | -6.05% | 6.92% | 26.04% | -5.76% | 22.99% | 4.45% | 6.15% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLV.L and SPXP.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USLV.L and SPXP.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Real Estate
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Healthcare
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Technology
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Energy
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Communication Services
USLV.L
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
USLV.L
SPXP.L
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USLV.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.52 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 4.11 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 15.13 | -14.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USLV.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 2.78 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.06 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 1.10 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.15 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLV.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -25.46% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -7.09% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.71% | -20.77% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | -20.77% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -25.46% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -0.21% | -7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -3.50% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.93% | +1.20% |
Volatility
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that USLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLV.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 2.65% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 7.24% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 10.49% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 14.23% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 16.22% | -2.22% |
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
USLV.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USLV.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USLV.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.
USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for USLV.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer