USLV.L vs. SPMV.L
USLV.L (SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and SPMV.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - USLV.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index while SPMV.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L returned 7.41%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for SPMV.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USLV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPMV.L.
Performance
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USLV.L is traded in GBP, while SPMV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L has underperformed SPMV.L with an annualized return of 7.41%, while SPMV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.
USLV.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.02%
SPMV.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.19%
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLV.L SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 7.48% | -2.67% | 15.48% | -6.04% | 6.92% | 26.04% | -5.76% | 22.99% | 4.04% | 6.57% |
SPMV.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.46% | 3.60% | 20.76% | 4.44% | -0.48% | 26.16% | 4.26% | 26.25% | 0.26% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLV.L and SPMV.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USLV.L and SPMV.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Financial Services
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Real Estate
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Industrials
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Consumer Defensive
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Healthcare
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Consumer Cyclical
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Energy
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Basic Materials
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Technology
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Communication Services
USLV.L
SPMV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
USLV.L
SPMV.L
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USLV.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.95 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 5.73 | -3.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than SPMV.L's maximum drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and SPMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLV.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -25.15% | -15.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -5.16% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -14.55% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.65% | -14.55% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -25.15% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.47% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -3.39% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.76% | +1.51% |
Volatility
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that USLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLV.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 2.69% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 7.21% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 9.58% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 12.67% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 14.17% | +2.70% |
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
USLV.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USLV.L nor SPMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USLV.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMV.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMV.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.
USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.20% for SPMV.L.
Find the right allocation for USLV.L and SPMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer