USLV.L vs. 3USL.L
USLV.L (SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - USLV.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L returned 8.39%/yr vs 29.45%/yr for 3USL.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USLV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USLV.L is traded in GBP, while 3USL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3USL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.64% return. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L has underperformed 3USL.L with an annualized return of 8.39%, while 3USL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 29.45% annualized return.
USLV.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
3USL.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 13.79%
- YTD
- 25.64%
- 6M
- 25.62%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 46.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.57%
- 10Y*
- 29.45%
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLV.L SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.11% | -2.67% | 15.49% | -6.05% | 6.92% | 26.04% | -5.76% | 22.99% | 4.45% | 6.15% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.64% | 19.79% | 66.86% | 61.97% | -52.27% | 103.68% | 4.72% | 90.45% | -23.03% | 54.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLV.L and 3USL.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between USLV.L and 3USL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USLV.L
3USL.L
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
USLV.L
3USL.L
Financial Services
USLV.L
3USL.L
Real Estate
USLV.L
3USL.L
Consumer Defensive
USLV.L
3USL.L
Industrials
USLV.L
3USL.L
Healthcare
USLV.L
3USL.L
Consumer Cyclical
USLV.L
3USL.L
Technology
USLV.L
3USL.L
Basic Materials
USLV.L
3USL.L
Energy
USLV.L
3USL.L
Communication Services
USLV.L
3USL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
USLV.L
3USL.L
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USLV.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.38 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.16 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 11.66 | -11.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USLV.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 2.37 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.64 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -73.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLV.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -73.93% | +46.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -25.03% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.71% | -49.79% | +39.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | -55.89% | +41.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -73.93% | +46.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -1.47% | -5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -14.38% | +9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 6.79% | -3.66% |
Volatility
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) is 3.76%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that USLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLV.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 9.36% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 24.34% | -16.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 33.30% | -22.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 45.36% | -33.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 46.90% | -32.90% |
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
USLV.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USLV.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USLV.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USLV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USLV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
USLV.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for USLV.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer