USIG vs. VCSH
USIG (iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and VCSH (Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - USIG tracks the ICE BofA US Corporate while VCSH tracks the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USIG returned 2.63%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for VCSH. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
USIG vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USIG achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USIG having a 2.63% annualized return and VCSH not far ahead at 2.70%.
USIG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 6.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
VCSH
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
USIG vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 7.86% | 2.56% | 8.71% | -15.30% | -1.34% | 9.44% | 13.99% | -2.21% | 5.75% |
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.64% | 6.77% | 4.91% | 6.20% | -5.62% | -0.63% | 5.13% | 7.02% | 0.92% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between USIG and VCSH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009 | 0.72 |
The correlation between USIG and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USIG vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank
USIG
VCSH
USIG vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USIG | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.29 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 13.55 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USIG | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.45 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.81 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.81 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.02 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
USIG vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIG drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIG and VCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USIG | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -12.86% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -1.40% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | -1.40% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.45% | -9.48% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.45% | -12.86% | -8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.32% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -0.97% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.34% | +0.52% |
Volatility
USIG vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.57%. This indicates that USIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USIG | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 0.57% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 1.38% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 1.88% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 2.88% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 3.35% | +3.47% |
USIG vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USIG and VCSH have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USIG vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison
USIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than VCSH's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIG iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.74% | 4.62% | 4.51% | 3.94% | 3.14% | 2.33% | 2.82% | 3.37% | 3.44% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.24% |
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.35% | 3.96% | 3.09% | 2.01% | 1.81% | 2.27% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 2.10% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USIG and VCSH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USIG has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VCSH (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USIG dropped -22.21% vs VCSH's -12.86%.
On 10-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.70% vs 2.63% for USIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.70% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USIG and VCSH have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
USIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.45% for VCSH.
USIG tracks ICE BofA US Corporate, while VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USIG and VCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer