PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIG vs. CBFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIG vs. CBFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIG achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than CBFSX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, USIG has underperformed CBFSX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while CBFSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.84% annualized return.


USIG

1D
0.18%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.73%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5.58%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.65%

CBFSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.29%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIG vs. CBFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.73%7.86%2.56%8.71%-15.30%-1.34%9.44%13.99%-2.21%5.75%
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
-0.07%7.45%2.71%9.20%-16.06%-0.77%10.23%15.05%-2.31%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between USIG and CBFSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.88

The correlation between USIG and CBFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIG vs. CBFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CBFSX
CBFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CBFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIG vs. CBFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USIGCBFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.61

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

4.82

+1.71

USIG vs. CBFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the CBFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIG and CBFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USIGCBFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.09

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.53

+0.01

Drawdowns

USIG vs. CBFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIG drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, roughly equal to the maximum CBFSX drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIG and CBFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIGCBFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-22.42%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-3.49%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-6.62%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-22.42%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

-22.42%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.85%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-4.36%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

1.16%

-0.30%

Volatility

USIG vs. CBFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) is 1.25%, while JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that USIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIGCBFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.47%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

3.13%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

4.29%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

6.64%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.82%

6.00%

+0.82%

USIG vs. CBFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CBFSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

USIG vs. CBFSX - Dividend Comparison

USIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than CBFSX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
4.54%4.54%4.99%4.18%4.06%7.96%3.74%3.14%4.55%6.78%3.11%3.11%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.73%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, USIG and CBFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CBFSX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to USIG (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USIG dropped -22.21% vs CBFSX's -22.42%.

USIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIG and CBFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer