USIC.L vs. VDPA.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USIC.L (Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and VDPA.L (Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Corporate Bonds funds - USIC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while VDPA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USIC.L returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for VDPA.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USIC.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VDPA.L.

Performance

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIC.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than VDPA.L's 0.62% return.

USIC.L

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 5.03%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VDPA.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.00%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 0.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
USIC.L Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	0.79%	7.41%	2.38%	8.08%	-15.02%	-0.30%
VDPA.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.62%	7.78%	2.82%	8.06%	-14.88%	-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between USIC.L and VDPA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021	0.89

The correlation between USIC.L and VDPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIC.L

USIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
USIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
USIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
USIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
USIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
USIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VDPA.L

VDPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VDPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
VDPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
VDPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VDPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USIC.L	VDPA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.10	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.57	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.19	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	1.84	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	5.60	-0.17

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIC.L and VDPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VDPA.L drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIC.L and VDPA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	USIC.L	VDPA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.41%	-21.43%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-2.71%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-5.61%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.60%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-5.93%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.89%	+0.04%

Volatility

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that USIC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USIC.L	VDPA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.30%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.51%	3.61%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64%	4.55%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.62%	6.87%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.62%	8.74%	-0.12%

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USIC.L vs. VDPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USIC.L nor VDPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USIC.L and VDPA.L in my portfolio?

USIC.L and VDPA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USIC.L or VDPA.L?

On fees, VDPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USIC.L or VDPA.L?

VDPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USIC.L.

What is the main difference between USIC.L and VDPA.L?

USIC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VDPA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USIC.L and 0.07% for VDPA.L.