PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIC.L vs. VUCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USIC.L is traded in USD, while VUCP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUCP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIC.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than VUCP.L's 0.87% return.


USIC.L

1D
0.49%
1M
1.39%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.19%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
10Y*

VUCP.L

1D
0.36%
1M
1.48%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USIC.L
Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.79%7.41%2.38%8.08%-15.02%-0.30%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.87%7.92%2.74%7.61%-14.97%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between USIC.L and VUCP.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.69

The correlation between USIC.L and VUCP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIC.L
USIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
USIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
USIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VUCP.L
VUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USIC.LVUCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.66

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

5.16

+0.26

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIC.L and VUCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VUCP.L drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIC.L and VUCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIC.LVUCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-21.37%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-3.10%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

-5.90%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.46%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-4.87%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.00%

-0.07%

Volatility

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) is 1.39%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that USIC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIC.LVUCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.79%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

4.33%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

5.51%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

7.66%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

7.73%

+0.89%

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VUCP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USIC.L vs. VUCP.L - Dividend Comparison

USIC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
USIC.L
Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.05%5.29%4.89%4.45%3.42%2.54%3.02%3.37%3.43%3.32%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


USIC.L and VUCP.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUCP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUCP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USIC.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USIC.L and 0.09% for VUCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIC.L and VUCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer