PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIC.L vs. PACW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USIC.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIC.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 9.47% return.


USIC.L

1D
0.49%
1M
1.39%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.19%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
10Y*

PACW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.47%
6M
9.27%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USIC.L and PACW.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIC.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIC.L
USIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
USIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
USIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USIC.LPACW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.72

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

11.51

-6.08

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIC.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIC.L and PACW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIC.LPACW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-17.07%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-9.14%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.70%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-2.00%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.16%

-1.23%

Volatility

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) is 1.39%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that USIC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIC.LPACW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

4.13%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

9.85%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

12.40%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

15.46%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

15.46%

-6.84%

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USIC.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

USIC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


USIC.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USIC.L.

USIC.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PACW.L is Global Equities. USIC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USIC.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIC.L and PACW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer