USIC.L vs. FLOA.L
USIC.L (Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USIC.L returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for FLOA.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USIC.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USIC.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.18% return.
USIC.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIC.L Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.79% | 7.41% | 2.38% | 8.08% | -15.02% | -0.30% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.18% | 4.89% | 6.42% | 6.65% | 1.35% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between USIC.L and FLOA.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
USIC.L
FLOA.L
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USIC.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.98 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 10.34 | -8.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 43.74 | -38.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIC.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USIC.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -14.96% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -0.46% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.87% | -1.77% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.15% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -0.22% | -8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.11% | +0.82% |
Volatility
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.51%. This indicates that USIC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USIC.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 0.51% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 1.35% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64% | 1.61% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 2.10% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 4.28% | +4.34% |
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USIC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USIC.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USIC.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USIC.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USIC.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USIC.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for USIC.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer