USIC.L vs. ERNA.L
USIC.L (Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and ERNA.L (iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds - USIC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while ERNA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USIC.L returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.14%/yr for ERNA.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USIC.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNA.L.
Performance
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USIC.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than ERNA.L's 1.75% return.
USIC.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERNA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- —
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIC.L Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.79% | 7.41% | 2.38% | 8.08% | -15.02% | -0.30% |
ERNA.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.75% | 4.85% | 5.65% | 5.44% | 1.46% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between USIC.L and ERNA.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L — Risk / Return Rank
USIC.L
ERNA.L
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USIC.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 2.05 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 13.37 | -11.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 54.91 | -49.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, which is greater than ERNA.L's maximum drawdown of -8.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIC.L and ERNA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USIC.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -8.63% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -0.32% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.87% | -0.33% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -0.10% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.08% | +0.85% |
Volatility
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor ESG USD Corporate Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (USIC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) at 0.39%. This indicates that USIC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USIC.L | ERNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 0.39% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 1.22% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64% | 1.43% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 1.24% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.62% | 2.25% | +6.37% |
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USIC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USIC.L vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USIC.L nor ERNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USIC.L and ERNA.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for USIC.L.
USIC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for USIC.L and 0.09% for ERNA.L.
Find the right allocation for USIC.L and ERNA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer