USHY vs. MLPA
USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USHY returned 4.21%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for MLPA. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MLPA.
Performance
USHY vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USHY achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 14.72% return.
USHY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
USHY vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.81% | 8.45% | 12.73% | -11.18% | 5.02% | 6.17% | 14.24% | -2.41% | 0.16% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 14.72% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | 6.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between USHY and MLPA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.36 |
The correlation between USHY and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USHY vs. MLPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USHY
MLPA
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
USHY
MLPA
Real Estate
USHY
MLPA
-
Basic Materials
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Communication Services
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Consumer Cyclical
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Consumer Defensive
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Financial Services
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Healthcare
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Industrials
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Technology
USHY
-
MLPA
-
Utilities
USHY
-
MLPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USHY vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
USHY
MLPA
USHY vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USHY | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.62 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 4.85 | +7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USHY vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USHY drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHY and MLPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USHY | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -78.75% | +56.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -8.33% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -14.20% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.56% | -18.75% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.96% | +4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -20.24% | +17.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.80% | -2.26% |
Volatility
USHY vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) is 1.20%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that USHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USHY | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 4.39% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 8.56% | -5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 11.93% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 18.19% | -10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.24% | 27.45% | -19.21% |
USHY vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
USHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
USHY vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
USHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than MLPA's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.36% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.90% | 6.79% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 6.08% | 5.07% | 5.30% | 5.92% | 6.30% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USHY and MLPA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to USHY (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHY dropped -22.44% vs MLPA's -78.75%.
On 5-year performance, MLPA leads with 13.94% vs 4.21% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 6.90% for USHY.
USHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MLPA is MLPs. USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USHY and 0.46% for MLPA.
USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USHY and MLPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer