PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USHY vs. FLRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USHY vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USHY achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.83% return.


USHY

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.77%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*

FLRT

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.55%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
5.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USHY vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.42%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
1.83%6.24%9.18%14.59%-2.72%3.18%2.78%9.44%-1.14%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between USHY and FLRT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.24

The correlation between USHY and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USHY vs. FLRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USHY
FLRT

Energy

99.2%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

USHY
99.2%
FLRT

-

Real Estate

USHY
0.8%
FLRT

-

Basic Materials

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Communication Services

USHY

-

FLRT
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Consumer Defensive

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Financial Services

USHY

-

FLRT
99.2%

Healthcare

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Industrials

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Technology

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Utilities

USHY

-

FLRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USHY vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USHY vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USHYFLRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.95

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.43

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

12.62

+0.41

USHY vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USHY and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USHYFLRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

3.89

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

2.61

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.75

-0.17

Drawdowns

USHY vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USHY drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHY and FLRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USHYFLRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-20.96%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-1.78%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-2.87%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-7.60%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.15%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-1.41%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.48%

+0.06%

Volatility

USHY vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.40%. This indicates that USHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USHYFLRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.40%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

1.19%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

1.57%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.34%

2.30%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.25%

6.17%

+2.08%

USHY vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

USHY vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

USHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than FLRT's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
6.81%6.93%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.92%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USHY and FLRT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USHY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to FLRT (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHY dropped -22.44% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

On 5-year performance, FLRT leads with 5.98% vs 4.24% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRT has performed better with a 5.98% return vs 4.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 6.81% for FLRT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USHY and 0.69% for FLRT.

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USHY and FLRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer