PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USHY vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USHY vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USHY achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 1.99% return.


USHY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.37%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*

FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USHY vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.75%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.99%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between USHY and FLOT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.23

The correlation between USHY and FLOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USHY vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USHY vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USHYFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

3.23

-1.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

11.32

-8.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

105.27

-92.50

USHY vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USHY and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USHY vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USHY drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHY and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USHYFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-13.54%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-0.43%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-1.57%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-2.36%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-0.21%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.05%

+0.49%

Volatility

USHY vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that USHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USHYFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.21%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

0.63%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

0.75%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

1.77%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.24%

4.15%

+4.09%

USHY vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USHY and FLOT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USHY vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

USHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than FLOT's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.90%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USHY and FLOT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USHY has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHY dropped -22.44% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 5-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.22% vs 4.21% for USHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.22% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY and FLOT have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 4.53% for FLOT.

USHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USHY and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer