USFR vs. WTV
USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree US Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while WTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USFR returned 3.66%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for WTV. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. USFR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
USFR vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 11.47% return.
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
WTV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
USFR vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | -0.04% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 11.47% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR and WTV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFR vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
USFR
WTV
USFR vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USFR | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +47.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.37 | 1.38 | +11.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 202.38 | 3.54 | +198.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 783.80 | 11.55 | +772.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USFR | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01 | 2.15 | +12.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 9.25 | 0.79 | +8.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.68 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
USFR vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFR | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -42.18% | +40.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -7.15% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -18.49% | +18.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.18% | -19.30% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -5.05% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.19% | -2.18% |
Volatility
USFR vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.06%, while WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFR | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 3.01% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.18% | 7.92% | -7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 11.82% | -11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 17.09% | -16.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.81% | 20.20% | -19.39% |
USFR vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USFR vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than WTV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFR and WTV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTV has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFR dropped -1.36% vs WTV's -42.18%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.36% vs 3.66% for USFR. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.64% for WTV.
USFR is categorized as Government Bonds, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR and 0.12% for WTV.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USFR and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer