USFR vs. SPMO
USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USFR returned 2.42%/yr vs 21.24%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USFR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
USFR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 32.66% return. Over the past 10 years, USFR has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 2.42%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 32.66%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 50.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.16%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 21.24%
USFR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.72% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 32.66% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR and SPMO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.00 |
The correlation between USFR and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
USFR
SPMO
USFR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +47.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.37 | 1.46 | +11.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 202.37 | 3.96 | +198.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 783.80 | 14.96 | +768.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -30.95% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -12.70% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -20.13% | +20.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.18% | -22.74% | +22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.80% | -30.95% | +30.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -4.60% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 3.35% | -3.34% |
Volatility
USFR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.08%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 10.78% | -10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 17.04% | -16.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 19.78% | -19.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 19.71% | -19.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 20.52% | -19.74% |
USFR vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USFR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than SPMO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.64% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFR and SPMO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFR dropped -1.36% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.24% vs 2.42% for USFR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.64% for SPMO.
USFR is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR and 0.13% for SPMO.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.85 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USFR and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer