USFR vs. MINT
USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. USFR is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, USFR returned 2.42%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for MINT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USFR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
USFR vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, USFR has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 2.42%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
USFR vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.72% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.94% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR and MINT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFR vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
USFR
MINT
USFR vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFR | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -15.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.37 | 21.40 | -8.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 202.37 | 94.29 | +108.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 783.80 | 954.48 | -170.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFR vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFR | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -4.62% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -0.05% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -0.16% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.18% | -2.42% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.80% | -4.62% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.17% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.00% | +0.01% |
Volatility
USFR vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.08%, while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) has a volatility of 0.09%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFR | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.09% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 0.20% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 0.58% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 0.95% | -0.17% |
USFR vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
USFR vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFR and MINT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINT has higher volatility (0.09%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFR dropped -1.36% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.72% vs 2.42% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.72% return vs 2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.
USFR is categorized as Government Bonds, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.39 vs 14.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USFR and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer