USFR vs. GDMN
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN).
USFR and GDMN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. GDMN is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021.
Performance
USFR vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USFR vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.93% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 8.77% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 5.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's 8.77% return.
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
GDMN
- 1D
- 9.38%
- 1M
- -27.72%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 31.63%
- 1Y
- 140.14%
- 3Y*
- 65.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USFR vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USFR vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
USFR
GDMN
USFR vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USFR | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 14.37 | 2.20 | +12.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 42.77 | 2.34 | +40.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 10.64 | 1.35 | +9.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 103.73 | 3.69 | +100.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 661.88 | 12.63 | +649.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USFR | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37 | 2.20 | +12.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 8.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 3.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.94 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR and GDMN is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USFR vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than GDMN's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 4.00% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.48% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USFR vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and GDMN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFR | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -52.82% | +51.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -39.03% | +38.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.60% | +28.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -18.45% | +18.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 11.39% | -11.38% |
Volatility
USFR vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.09%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.97%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USFR | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 24.97% | -24.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 53.89% | -53.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29% | 63.99% | -63.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 47.19% | -46.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.81% | 47.19% | -46.38% |