PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFR.L vs. MDBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USFR.L is traded in USD, while MDBU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MDBU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFR.L achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than MDBU.L's -0.12% return.


USFR.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

MDBU.L

1D
0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
1.59%4.13%5.41%4.94%2.05%-0.16%0.57%1.47%
MDBU.L
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.12%6.36%3.23%3.92%-7.56%-1.25%4.41%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between USFR.L and MDBU.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFR.L
USFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
USFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MDBU.L
MDBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USFR.LMDBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.13

+0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.72

1.63

+13.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

58.09

4.69

+53.40

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFR.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFR.L and MDBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USFR.LMDBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

0.75

+2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.39

0.15

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.33

+1.18

Drawdowns

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFR.L drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum MDBU.L drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR.L and MDBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFR.LMDBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-12.15%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

-2.12%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.89%

-2.70%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.89%

-11.72%

+10.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.38%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-3.44%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.74%

-0.67%

Volatility

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (USFR.L) is 0.28%, while UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that USFR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFR.LMDBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

1.46%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

3.55%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

4.62%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.50%

6.32%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

6.38%

-4.54%

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBU.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USFR.L vs. MDBU.L - Dividend Comparison

USFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than MDBU.L's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MDBU.L
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.14%3.96%2.14%1.92%0.75%0.74%1.73%1.66%
USFR.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD
3.99%4.32%5.24%4.58%0.78%0.00%0.57%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFR.L and MDBU.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USFR.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USFR.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.L.

USFR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while MDBU.L tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR.L and 0.18% for MDBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFR.L and MDBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer