PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USFM.L is traded in GBp, while IUQA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUQA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFM.L achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than IUQA.L's 10.10% return.


USFM.L

1D
1.01%
1M
5.03%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.91%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*

IUQA.L

1D
1.02%
1M
1.65%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.24%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
15.71%5.73%20.11%10.47%-3.22%26.12%10.79%25.56%-0.38%-15.16%
IUQA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
10.10%4.45%24.62%24.41%-11.32%28.77%12.68%28.25%-1.39%9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between USFM.L and IUQA.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.85

The correlation between USFM.L and IUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USFM.L
IUQA.L

Technology

21.7%
38.8%

Financial Services

16.9%
10.8%

Industrials

13.3%
7.2%

Healthcare

13.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
11.8%

Energy

5.5%
3.2%

Utilities

3.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.9%

Technology

USFM.L
21.7%
IUQA.L
38.8%

Financial Services

USFM.L
16.9%
IUQA.L
10.8%

Industrials

USFM.L
13.3%
IUQA.L
7.2%

Healthcare

USFM.L
13.1%
IUQA.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

USFM.L
7.9%
IUQA.L
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

USFM.L
6.2%
IUQA.L
9.3%

Communication Services

USFM.L
5.8%
IUQA.L
11.8%

Energy

USFM.L
5.5%
IUQA.L
3.2%

Utilities

USFM.L
3.8%
IUQA.L
2.1%

Real Estate

USFM.L
2.9%
IUQA.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

USFM.L
2.9%
IUQA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFM.L
USFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
USFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
USFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IUQA.L
IUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USFM.LIUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

3.70

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.50

13.27

+5.23

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFM.L and IUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, which is greater than IUQA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFM.L and IUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFM.LIUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.52%

-25.96%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-6.68%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.40%

-20.32%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-20.32%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-4.66%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.86%

-0.33%

Volatility

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) is 2.60%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that USFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFM.LIUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.45%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

8.69%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

11.53%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.70%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

30.78%

-13.66%

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUQA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while IUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUQA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.03%1.20%1.14%1.37%1.22%1.01%1.34%1.30%1.37%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFM.L and IUQA.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUQA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.

USFM.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USFM.L and 0.20% for IUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFM.L and IUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer