USFM.L vs. IUQA.L
USFM.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and IUQA.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USFM.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while IUQA.L tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USFM.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for IUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUQA.L.
Performance
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USFM.L is traded in GBp, while IUQA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUQA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFM.L achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than IUQA.L's 10.10% return.
USFM.L
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 28.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IUQA.L
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 15.71% | 5.73% | 20.11% | 10.47% | -3.22% | 26.12% | 10.79% | 25.56% | -0.38% | -15.16% |
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 10.10% | 4.45% | 24.62% | 24.41% | -11.32% | 28.77% | 12.68% | 28.25% | -1.39% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFM.L and IUQA.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between USFM.L and IUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Financial Services
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Industrials
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Healthcare
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Communication Services
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Energy
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Utilities
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Real Estate
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Basic Materials
USFM.L
IUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
USFM.L
IUQA.L
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFM.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 3.70 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | 13.27 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, which is greater than IUQA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFM.L and IUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFM.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -25.96% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | -6.68% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.40% | -20.32% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.40% | -20.32% | +2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.69% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -4.66% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.86% | -0.33% |
Volatility
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) is 2.60%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that USFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFM.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.45% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 8.69% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 11.53% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 15.70% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 30.78% | -13.66% |
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUQA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USFM.L vs. IUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while IUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.01% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFM.L and IUQA.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUQA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.
USFM.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USFM.L and 0.20% for IUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for USFM.L and IUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer