PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEP vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USEP vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USEP vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
-1.68%11.75%12.39%18.62%-7.98%3.71%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.61%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEP achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 0.61% return.


USEP

1D
1.47%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*

EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USEP vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USEP vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEP
USEP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
USEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
USEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEP vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USEPEAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.64

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

2.39

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.77

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

13.21

-2.62

USEP vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEP and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USEPEAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.64

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.36

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between USEP and EAPR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

USEP vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither USEP nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

USEP vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEP drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEP and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USEPEAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-17.65%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-6.99%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.97%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-4.18%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

0.94%

+0.26%

Volatility

USEP vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 1.23%. This indicates that USEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USEPEAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.23%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

2.42%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.90%

7.73%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

9.82%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

9.82%

-1.69%