USE vs. GSG
Compare and contrast key facts about USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG).
USE and GSG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USE is an actively managed fund by USCF. It was launched on May 3, 2023. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006.
Performance
USE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund | 38.21% | -14.97% | 22.58% | 9.98% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 45.06% | 5.93% | 8.52% | 6.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USE achieves a 38.21% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 45.06% return.
USE
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- 29.54%
- YTD
- 38.21%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 12.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- 22.44%
- YTD
- 45.06%
- 6M
- 47.42%
- 1Y
- 45.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
USE
GSG
USE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.13 | -1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 2.88 | -2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.39 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 3.94 | -3.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 10.99 | -10.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.13 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | -0.08 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between USE and GSG is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
USE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund | 2.21% | 3.06% | 38.65% | 4.83% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USE drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USE and GSG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -89.62% | +63.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.24% | -8.10% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -56.21% | +55.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -63.77% | +55.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.59% | 4.27% | +10.32% |
Volatility
USE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 11.90%. This indicates that USE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.47% | 11.90% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.27% | 16.88% | +5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.33% | 21.65% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 22.06% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 21.82% | +4.40% |