USE vs. FTGC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

USE (USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USE returned 10.27%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for FTGC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.

Performance

USE vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USE achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 18.82% return.

USE

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: -17.66%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 3.42%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTGC

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -6.57%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 6M: 17.76%
• 1Y: 30.88%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USE vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	17.68%	-14.97%	22.58%	9.68%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	18.82%	14.61%	9.96%	2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between USE and FTGC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.56

The correlation between USE and FTGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USE vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USE

USE Risk / Return Rank: 10
USE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
USE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
USE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
USE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
USE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 66
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USE vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USE	FTGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	1.99	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	2.67	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.35	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	2.51	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	9.99	-9.74

USE vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USE Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USE and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USE vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USE drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USE and FTGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	USE	FTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.38%	-59.47%	+33.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-12.34%	-14.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.38%	-12.34%	-14.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.37%	-10.90%	-13.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.12%	-27.33%	+19.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.98%	3.10%	+10.88%

Volatility

USE vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 3.89%. This indicates that USE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USE	FTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	3.89%	+7.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.86%	13.37%	+14.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.31%	15.60%	+15.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.42%	15.90%	+11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.42%	14.72%	+12.70%

USE vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

USE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

USE vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

USE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than FTGC's 16.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	16.86%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	2.60%	3.06%	38.65%	4.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USE and FTGC in my portfolio?

USE and FTGC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USE or FTGC?

USE has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to FTGC (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USE dropped -26.38% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

Which ETF is better, USE or FTGC?

On 3-year performance, FTGC leads with 14.15% vs 10.27% for USE. On fees, USE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USE or FTGC?

Over the 3-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 10.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USE or FTGC?

USE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USE or FTGC?

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.86%, compared with 2.60% for USE.

What is the main difference between USE and FTGC?

They also come from different issuers: USCF and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for USE and 0.95% for FTGC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.