PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USE vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USE vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USE vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USE
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund
38.21%-14.97%22.58%9.98%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
13.56%7.72%5.81%-8.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USE achieves a 38.21% return, which is significantly higher than COM's 13.56% return.


USE

1D
5.65%
1M
29.54%
YTD
38.21%
6M
17.19%
1Y
12.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COM

1D
0.12%
1M
4.71%
YTD
13.56%
6M
17.91%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USE vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USE vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USE
USE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
USE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
USE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
USE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USE vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USECOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

1.61

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

2.12

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.76

-2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.89

5.94

-5.05

USE vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the COM Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USE and COM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USECOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

1.61

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.72

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between USE and COM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

USE vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

USE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than COM's 2.49% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USE
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund
2.21%3.06%38.65%4.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.49%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%

Drawdowns

USE vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USE drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USE and COM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USECOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-15.95%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.24%

-4.33%

-21.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.17%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-6.37%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.59%

2.86%

+11.73%

Volatility

USE vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 3.84%. This indicates that USE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USECOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.47%

3.84%

+11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

8.25%

+14.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.33%

10.37%

+19.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.22%

9.71%

+16.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.22%

9.75%

+16.47%