PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDV.L vs. XMVU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USDV.L is traded in GBP, while XMVU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMVU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.55% return.


USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%

XMVU.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.21%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%1.49%6.73%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
2.52%0.25%17.70%4.30%1.22%22.78%1.32%20.17%4.68%8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between USDV.L and XMVU.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.76

The correlation between USDV.L and XMVU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USDV.L
XMVU.L

Industrials

17.5%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
10.0%

Utilities

14.8%
7.6%

Financial Services

11.5%
13.7%

Technology

8.9%
29.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
2.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
6.4%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.2%

Energy

4.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.5%
6.0%

Industrials

USDV.L
17.5%
XMVU.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

USDV.L
17.0%
XMVU.L
10.0%

Utilities

USDV.L
14.8%
XMVU.L
7.6%

Financial Services

USDV.L
11.5%
XMVU.L
13.7%

Technology

USDV.L
8.9%
XMVU.L
29.6%

Basic Materials

USDV.L
6.4%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Healthcare

USDV.L
6.2%
XMVU.L
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

USDV.L
5.2%
XMVU.L
6.4%

Real Estate

USDV.L
4.6%
XMVU.L
2.2%

Energy

USDV.L
4.5%
XMVU.L
3.5%

Communication Services

USDV.L
3.5%
XMVU.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVU.L
XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDV.LXMVU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.10

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.05

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

2.53

+2.89

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDV.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDV.LXMVU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.56

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.69

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.65

+0.19

Drawdowns

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than XMVU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and XMVU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDV.LXMVU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-24.94%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-5.07%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-11.48%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-11.48%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-2.86%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-4.01%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.11%

+0.47%

Volatility

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.53%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDV.LXMVU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.31%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.14%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

9.47%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

12.13%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

13.83%

+1.50%

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVU.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

USDV.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than XMVU.L's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%
XMVU.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D
1.18%1.24%1.31%1.33%1.82%1.27%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDV.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMVU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMVU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while XMVU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.20% for XMVU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDV.L and XMVU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer