USDV.L vs. MXUS.L
USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) and MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while MXUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USDV.L returned 9.41%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for MXUS.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USDV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MXUS.L.
Performance
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USDV.L is traded in GBP, while MXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than MXUS.L's 9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, USDV.L has underperformed MXUS.L with an annualized return of 9.41%, while MXUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
MXUS.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 26.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 11.92% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.51% | 11.56% | 26.74% | -2.72% | 18.93% | 1.52% | 5.36% |
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 9.58% | 8.98% | 27.77% | 21.44% | -10.52% | 29.11% | 17.43% | 26.02% | 0.70% | 10.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between USDV.L and MXUS.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2011 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USDV.L and MXUS.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Consumer Defensive
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Utilities
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Technology
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Financial Services
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Healthcare
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Basic Materials
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Real Estate
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Energy
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Communication Services
USDV.L
MXUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
USDV.L
MXUS.L
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USDV.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.42 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 11.06 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than MXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and MXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USDV.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -26.52% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -7.59% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -21.41% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -21.41% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.79% | -26.52% | -1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.41% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -3.56% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.35% | +0.24% |
Volatility
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.34%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USDV.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 4.03% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 9.26% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.61% | 12.28% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.79% | 15.73% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 16.46% | -1.29% |
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
USDV.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.01% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.28% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 2.57% | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USDV.L and MXUS.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.05% for MXUS.L.
Find the right allocation for USDV.L and MXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer