PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDG.L vs. LGUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDG.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than LGUK.L's 3.73% return.


USDG.L

1D
0.34%
1M
1.26%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.27%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

LGUK.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
3.73%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USDG.L
L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.73%0.15%4.75%2.41%-3.62%1.57%
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
3.73%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between USDG.L and LGUK.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

-0.08

The correlation between USDG.L and LGUK.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDG.L
USDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
USDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDG.LLGUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.92

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

6.51

-3.19

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDG.L and LGUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDG.LLGUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.24

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.82

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.52

-0.40

Drawdowns

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDG.L drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, smaller than the maximum LGUK.L drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDG.L and LGUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDG.LLGUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-33.76%

+20.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-9.30%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.61%

-12.30%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.80%

-12.30%

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-5.71%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-4.82%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.75%

-0.78%

Volatility

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) is 1.98%, while L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that USDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDG.LLGUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

4.30%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

12.53%

-5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

14.42%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.67%

13.86%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.64%

16.31%

-7.67%

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USDG.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

USDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while LGUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDG.L
L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.67%4.70%3.99%3.27%2.25%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDG.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for USDG.L.

USDG.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while LGUK.L is Europe Equities. USDG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for USDG.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDG.L and LGUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer