PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCR.L vs. FLOA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCR.L achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.04% return.


USCR.L

1D
0.26%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.76%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*

FLOA.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.24%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USCR.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF
0.18%7.70%2.19%8.02%-15.48%-1.86%2.28%
FLOA.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.04%4.98%6.42%6.62%1.35%0.42%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between USCR.L and FLOA.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCR.L
USCR.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USCR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOA.L
FLOA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCR.LFLOA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

2.07

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

10.50

-8.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

55.93

-50.02

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCR.L and FLOA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCR.LFLOA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

4.02

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

2.16

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.79

-0.76

Drawdowns

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCR.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCR.L and FLOA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCR.LFLOA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-14.96%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-0.48%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-1.74%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

-2.53%

-19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.06%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-0.22%

-8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.09%

+0.86%

Volatility

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.49%. This indicates that USCR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCR.LFLOA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

0.49%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

1.13%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

1.24%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

1.98%

+5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

4.27%

+2.72%

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCR.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USCR.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USCR.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USCR.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USCR.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCR.L and FLOA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer