USCR.L vs. CBS5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L).
USCR.L and CBS5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USCR.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Oct 23, 2020. CBS5.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022. Both USCR.L and CBS5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCR.L SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF | -0.62% | 7.70% | 2.19% | 8.02% | -3.55% |
CBS5.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -0.13% | 7.30% | 4.27% | 5.56% | -0.80% |
Different Trading Currencies
USCR.L is traded in USD, while CBS5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CBS5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCR.L achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than CBS5.L's -0.13% return.
USCR.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CBS5.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CBS5.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L — Risk / Return Rank
USCR.L
CBS5.L
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCR.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.00 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.48 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.25 | -1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 9.10 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCR.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.00 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.69 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between USCR.L and CBS5.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USCR.L nor CBS5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCR.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, which is greater than CBS5.L's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCR.L and CBS5.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCR.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -14.59% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.10% | -5.18% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -2.59% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -6.41% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 2.69% | -1.67% |
Volatility
USCR.L vs. CBS5.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) at 1.57%. This indicates that USCR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBS5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USCR.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 1.57% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 3.02% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.74% | 4.66% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 5.96% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 5.96% | +1.07% |