USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE
USCP.DE (Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value TR UCITS ETF (EUR)) and LCUS.DE (Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USCP.DE tracks the Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value while LCUS.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCP.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUS.DE.
Performance
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USCP.DE
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
LCUS.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCP.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value TR UCITS ETF (EUR) | 1.13% | -3.26% | 22.70% | 25.56% | -10.80% | 38.73% | 7.54% | 33.98% | 0.77% |
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 3.40% | 32.87% | 22.96% | -15.87% | 37.82% | 9.09% | 34.14% | -0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCP.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between USCP.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
USCP.DE
LCUS.DE
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value TR UCITS ETF (EUR) (USCP.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCP.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCP.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCP.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.42% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCP.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | — | — |
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCP.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCP.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither USCP.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 2.27% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.10% | 1.30% |
USCP.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value TR UCITS ETF (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCP.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for USCP.DE.
USCP.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector Value, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for USCP.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for USCP.DE and LCUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer