USCL vs. IVV
USCL (Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USCL returned 20.82% vs 28.00% for IVV. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. USCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
USCL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.
USCL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
USCL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 7.04% | 14.26% | 27.04% | 12.71% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL and IVV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between USCL and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
USCL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USCL
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USCL
IVV
Financial Services
USCL
IVV
Communication Services
USCL
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
USCL
IVV
Healthcare
USCL
IVV
Industrials
USCL
IVV
Consumer Defensive
USCL
IVV
Energy
USCL
IVV
Utilities
USCL
IVV
Real Estate
USCL
IVV
Basic Materials
USCL
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
USCL
IVV
USCL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.17 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 14.71 | -6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.39 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.45 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
USCL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -55.25% | +36.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -8.89% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.76% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -10.78% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.91% | +0.67% |
Volatility
USCL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.87% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 8.90% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 11.80% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 16.88% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 18.05% | -3.21% |
USCL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USCL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, which matches IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 1.07% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, USCL and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to USCL (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 1-year performance, IVV leads with 28.00% vs 20.82% for USCL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVV has performed better with a 28.00% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USCL.
USCL and IVV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.07%.
USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCL and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer