USCL vs. CSHP
USCL (Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. USCL is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, USCL returned 15.61% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
USCL vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.
USCL
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 3.65% | 14.26% | 6.63% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL and CSHP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between USCL and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
USCL
CSHP
USCL vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USCL | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 6.46 | -5.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 65.45 | -63.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 381.67 | -375.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USCL vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -0.08% | -18.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -0.06% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -0.04% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -0.00% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 0.01% | +2.66% |
Volatility
USCL vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that USCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 0.16% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 0.27% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 0.36% | +12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 0.41% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 0.41% | +14.53% |
USCL vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USCL vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 1.13% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCL and CSHP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USCL has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, USCL leads with 15.61% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, USCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USCL has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.13% for USCL.
USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCL and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer