PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL.TO vs. IDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USCL.TO is traded in CAD, while IDVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDVO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than IDVO's 15.57% return.


USCL.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.59%
YTD
11.57%
6M
9.93%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDVO

1D
-0.84%
1M
4.12%
YTD
15.57%
6M
14.22%
1Y
37.03%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.57%10.03%38.54%4.33%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
15.57%30.20%19.62%8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between USCL.TO and IDVO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023

0.55

The correlation between USCL.TO and IDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCL.TO
IDVO

Technology

33.1%
8.7%

Financial Services

12.3%
18.3%

Communication Services

10.7%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.2%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.3%

Industrials

8.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
7.5%

Energy

3.5%
12.1%

Utilities

2.5%
6.4%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
15.7%

Technology

USCL.TO
33.1%
IDVO
8.7%

Financial Services

USCL.TO
12.3%
IDVO
18.3%

Communication Services

USCL.TO
10.7%
IDVO
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USCL.TO
10.1%
IDVO
4.2%

Healthcare

USCL.TO
9.8%
IDVO
8.3%

Industrials

USCL.TO
8.7%
IDVO
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

USCL.TO
5.4%
IDVO
7.5%

Energy

USCL.TO
3.5%
IDVO
12.1%

Utilities

USCL.TO
2.5%
IDVO
6.4%

Real Estate

USCL.TO
2.0%
IDVO

-

Basic Materials

USCL.TO
1.9%
IDVO
15.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL.TO vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCL.TOIDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.69

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

15.10

-0.81

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the IDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL.TO and IDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCL.TOIDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.52

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

1.75

-0.33

Drawdowns

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and IDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCL.TOIDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-15.82%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-10.07%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.84%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-1.72%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.46%

-0.36%

Volatility

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) is 2.86%, while Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that USCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCL.TOIDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

5.12%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

12.36%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

14.79%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

14.03%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

14.03%

+1.41%

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IDVO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCL.TO vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.95%, more than IDVO's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.48%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.95%12.94%11.57%7.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCL.TO and IDVO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for USCL.TO and 0.65% for IDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL.TO and IDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer