PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USCL.TO is traded in CAD, while HYLD-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than HYLD-U.TO's 16.59% return.


USCL.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.59%
YTD
11.57%
6M
9.93%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYLD-U.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
11.64%
YTD
16.59%
6M
14.32%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.57%10.03%38.54%4.33%
HYLD-U.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)
16.59%14.33%34.31%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023

0.85

The correlation between USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCL.TO
HYLD-U.TO

Technology

33.1%
33.9%

Financial Services

12.3%
12.4%

Communication Services

10.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.8%

Industrials

8.7%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.4%

Energy

3.5%
4.9%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.0%

Technology

USCL.TO
33.1%
HYLD-U.TO
33.9%

Financial Services

USCL.TO
12.3%
HYLD-U.TO
12.4%

Communication Services

USCL.TO
10.7%
HYLD-U.TO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USCL.TO
10.1%
HYLD-U.TO
8.1%

Healthcare

USCL.TO
9.8%
HYLD-U.TO
9.8%

Industrials

USCL.TO
8.7%
HYLD-U.TO
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

USCL.TO
5.4%
HYLD-U.TO
3.4%

Energy

USCL.TO
3.5%
HYLD-U.TO
4.9%

Utilities

USCL.TO
2.5%
HYLD-U.TO
2.4%

Real Estate

USCL.TO
2.0%
HYLD-U.TO
3.8%

Basic Materials

USCL.TO
1.9%
HYLD-U.TO
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD-U.TO
HYLD-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCL.TOHYLD-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.28

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

11.78

+2.51

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCL.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

0.79

+0.63

Drawdowns

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum HYLD-U.TO drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCL.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-24.30%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-12.17%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-7.49%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.38%

-1.28%

Volatility

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) is 2.86%, while Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that USCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLD-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCL.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.24%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

11.38%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

14.62%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

17.91%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

17.91%

-2.47%

Dividends

USCL.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.95%, more than HYLD-U.TO's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYLD-U.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)
7.57%8.06%8.49%8.82%9.99%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.95%12.94%11.57%7.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL.TO and HYLD-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer