PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-5.43%10.03%13.36%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
-0.05%3.05%-1.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL.TO's -0.05% return.


USCL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-5.43%
6M
-3.57%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.35%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCL.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

0.85

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

1.19

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.33

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.74

3.88

-1.13

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL.TO and HBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCL.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.85

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.49

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between USCL.TO and HBIL.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.67% yield.


TTM202520242023
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.76%12.94%11.57%7.08%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
6.67%7.49%2.58%0.00%

Drawdowns

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and HBIL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USCL.TOHBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-1.69%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-1.30%

-13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.56%

-0.95%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-0.48%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

0.45%

+3.18%

Volatility

USCL.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.72%. This indicates that USCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USCL.TOHBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

0.72%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

1.14%

+8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

1.86%

+18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

2.06%

+13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

2.06%

+13.56%