USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO
USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and FCMI.TO (Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCL.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while FCMI.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCL.TO returned 21.51%/yr vs 13.93%/yr for FCMI.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USCL.TO charges 1.61%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FCMI.TO.
Performance
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCMI.TO's 9.25% return.
USCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 26.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCMI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 13.70% | 10.03% | 38.54% | 8.88% |
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 9.25% | 15.02% | 13.11% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL.TO and FCMI.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2023 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
USCL.TO
FCMI.TO
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USCL.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.80 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 5.36 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 20.61 | -8.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum FCMI.TO drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and FCMI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -63.80% | +41.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -3.62% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.85% | -6.63% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -18.96% | +17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -41.60% | +39.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.94% | +1.20% |
Volatility
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO) at 2.10%. This indicates that USCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.10% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 4.99% | +5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 6.39% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 7.80% | +7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 22.20% | -6.64% |
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL.TO has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCL.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Dividend Comparison
USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%, more than FCMI.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 3.28% | 3.38% | 3.63% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 2.76% | 6.22% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.76% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCL.TO and FCMI.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCMI.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCMI.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.61% for USCL.TO.
USCL.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FCMI.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.61% for USCL.TO and 0.50% for FCMI.TO.
Find the right allocation for USCL.TO and FCMI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer