PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMCL.NEO's 26.93% return.


USCL.TO

1D
0.08%
1M
1.09%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.79%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMCL.NEO

1D
0.27%
1M
3.04%
YTD
26.93%
6M
28.29%
1Y
47.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
12.39%10.03%21.18%
EMCL.NEO
Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF
26.93%20.46%3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024

0.56

The correlation between USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO

Technology

35.6%
40.3%

Financial Services

11.8%
19.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
2.2%

Industrials

8.3%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.8%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
7.0%

Technology

USCL.TO
35.6%
EMCL.NEO
40.3%

Financial Services

USCL.TO
11.8%
EMCL.NEO
19.8%

Communication Services

USCL.TO
11.2%
EMCL.NEO
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USCL.TO
10.1%
EMCL.NEO
6.3%

Healthcare

USCL.TO
8.5%
EMCL.NEO
2.2%

Industrials

USCL.TO
8.3%
EMCL.NEO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

USCL.TO
4.9%
EMCL.NEO
2.8%

Energy

USCL.TO
3.5%
EMCL.NEO
4.2%

Utilities

USCL.TO
2.4%
EMCL.NEO
2.1%

Real Estate

USCL.TO
1.9%
EMCL.NEO
1.1%

Basic Materials

USCL.TO
1.8%
EMCL.NEO
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCL.NEO
EMCL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMCL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCL.TOEMCL.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.74

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

13.41

-0.28

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the EMCL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than EMCL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCL.TOEMCL.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-19.73%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-13.12%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-4.65%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-2.57%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.61%

-1.48%

Volatility

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) is 4.37%, while Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that USCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCL.TOEMCL.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

12.60%

-8.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

20.76%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

22.56%

-10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

23.02%

-7.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

23.02%

-7.36%

Dividends

USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, more than EMCL.NEO's 10.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EMCL.NEO
Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF
10.20%9.86%3.10%0.00%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.86%12.94%11.57%7.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer