USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO
USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and EMCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, USCL.TO returned 27.85% vs 47.60% for EMCL.NEO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMCL.NEO's 26.93% return.
USCL.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCL.NEO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 26.93%
- 6M
- 28.29%
- 1Y
- 47.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 12.39% | 10.03% | 21.18% |
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 26.93% | 20.46% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Financial Services
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Communication Services
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Healthcare
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Industrials
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Defensive
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Energy
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Utilities
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Real Estate
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Basic Materials
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
USCL.TO
EMCL.NEO
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USCL.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.74 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 13.41 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than EMCL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -19.73% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -13.12% | +4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -4.65% | +3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -2.57% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 3.61% | -1.48% |
Volatility
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) is 4.37%, while Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that USCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 12.60% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 20.76% | -10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 22.56% | -10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 23.02% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 23.02% | -7.36% |
Dividends
USCL.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, more than EMCL.NEO's 10.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 10.20% | 9.86% | 3.10% | 0.00% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.86% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for USCL.TO and EMCL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer