PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-5.43%10.03%38.54%4.33%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
6.25%45.93%20.38%17.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 6.25% return.


USCL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-5.43%
6M
-3.57%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS.TO

1D
5.64%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
6.25%
6M
12.90%
1Y
74.89%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCL.TOCHPS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

1.98

-1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

2.58

-1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

4.78

-4.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.74

15.10

-12.36

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL.TO and CHPS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCL.TOCHPS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.98

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.60

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between USCL.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%, more than CHPS.TO's 0.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.76%12.94%11.57%7.08%0.00%0.00%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%

Drawdowns

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and CHPS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USCL.TOCHPS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-48.16%

+26.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-15.68%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.56%

-7.93%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-14.36%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

4.96%

-1.33%

Volatility

USCL.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) is 5.13%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that USCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USCL.TOCHPS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

12.07%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

24.85%

-15.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

37.95%

-17.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

33.66%

-18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

33.66%

-18.04%