PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCI vs. UYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCI vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCI achieves a 28.22% return, which is significantly higher than UYLD's 1.91% return.


USCI

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
28.22%
6M
26.35%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
8.86%

UYLD

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCI vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
28.22%17.63%17.24%-0.00%4.49%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
1.91%5.36%6.10%6.90%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between USCI and UYLD is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022

-0.09

The correlation between USCI and UYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCI vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UYLD
UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCI vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCIUYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-18.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

4.35

-2.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

38.06

-33.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

225.76

-209.58

USCI vs. UYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the UYLD Sharpe Ratio of 8.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCI and UYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCIUYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

8.00

-5.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

5.98

-5.68

Drawdowns

USCI vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCI drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, which is greater than UYLD's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCI and UYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCIUYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-0.54%

-65.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-0.14%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

-0.54%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-0.01%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.51%

-0.03%

-29.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

0.02%

+2.48%

Volatility

USCI vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison

United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) at 0.38%. This indicates that USCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCIUYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

0.38%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

0.50%

+13.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

0.65%

+16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

1.00%

+17.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

1.00%

+14.85%

USCI vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCI vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison

USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
5.03%5.07%4.97%5.92%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCI and UYLD have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCI has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCI dropped -66.41% vs UYLD's -0.54%.

On 3-year performance, USCI leads with 23.15% vs 5.89% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USCI has performed better with a 23.15% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.

UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.

USCI is categorized as Commodities, while UYLD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for USCI and 0.29% for UYLD.

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.00 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCI and UYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer