PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCI vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCI vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCI achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly higher than COM's 11.12% return.


USCI

1D
-0.23%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
19.17%
6M
17.13%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
8.18%

COM

1D
-1.21%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.20%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCI vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
19.17%17.63%17.24%-0.00%29.47%33.07%-11.47%-1.68%-11.76%8.14%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
11.12%7.72%5.81%-2.09%9.17%28.00%6.63%-0.18%-0.03%-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between USCI and COM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2017

0.63

The correlation between USCI and COM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCI vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCI vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCICOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.45

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

8.97

-0.43

USCI vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the COM Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCI and COM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCI vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCI drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCI and COM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCICOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-15.95%

-50.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-7.74%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

-8.50%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-14.02%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.94%

-7.74%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-6.28%

-23.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.12%

+0.79%

Volatility

USCI vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 2.26%. This indicates that USCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCICOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.26%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.03%

8.61%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

10.59%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

9.55%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

9.77%

+6.08%

USCI vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCI vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.55%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCI and COM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCI has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to COM (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCI dropped -66.41% vs COM's -15.95%.

On 5-year performance, USCI leads with 18.39% vs 7.89% for COM. On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, COM has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USCI has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.

COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.

USCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity (TR), while COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for USCI and 0.70% for COM.

COM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCI and COM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer