USCF vs. LVDS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. USCF is passively managed, while LVDS is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.

Performance

USCF vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCF achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 13.56% return.

USCF

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 3.99%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 16.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVDS

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCF vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	3.99%	7.47%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	13.56%	7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between USCF and LVDS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.75

USCF vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCF	LVDS
Financial Services	43.1%	18.3%
Energy	21.1%	6.6%
Healthcare	16.6%	8.6%
Technology	9.7%	15.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	8.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%
Communication Services	0.6%	7.5%
Industrials	0.4%	10.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	4.2%
Utilities	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

USCF vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCF

USCF Risk / Return Rank: 44
USCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
USCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
USCF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
USCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
USCF Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCF vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCF	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.69	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCF	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	2.39	-1.31

Drawdowns

USCF vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCF and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCF	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-6.64%	-10.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	0.00%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-0.98%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USCF	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	10.43%	+2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	10.43%	+4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	10.43%	+4.73%

USCF vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCF vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

USCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than LVDS's 7.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.56%	8.25%	0.00%
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	1.77%	1.84%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCF and LVDS in my portfolio?

USCF and LVDS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USCF or LVDS?

On fees, USCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCF or LVDS?

USCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCF or LVDS?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.77% for USCF.

What is the main difference between USCF and LVDS?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USCF and 0.30% for LVDS.