PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-2.45%9.20%31.13%5.08%
HPYT.TO
Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A
-1.26%4.39%-5.96%4.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCC.TO achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than HPYT.TO's -1.26% return.


USCC.TO

1D
1.61%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
-2.45%
6M
-0.76%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.31%

HPYT.TO

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-1.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCC.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYT.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCC.TO
USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

HPYT.TO
HPYT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HPYT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCC.TOHPYT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

-0.13

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

-0.11

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.99

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

-0.07

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.94

-0.16

+4.10

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the HPYT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCC.TO and HPYT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCC.TOHPYT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

-0.13

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.05

+0.82

Correlation

The correlation between USCC.TO and HPYT.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, less than HPYT.TO's 16.79% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
9.61%10.20%9.65%8.50%7.94%4.02%3.85%3.89%4.76%4.29%4.68%4.78%
HPYT.TO
Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A
16.79%18.87%18.61%3.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than HPYT.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCC.TO and HPYT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USCC.TOHPYT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-13.17%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-7.76%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-8.22%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-5.76%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.42%

-0.56%

Volatility

USCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO) at 3.47%. This indicates that USCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USCC.TOHPYT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

3.47%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

5.70%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

9.62%

+6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

11.08%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

11.08%

+6.32%