PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USBOX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than PRWCX's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, USBOX has outperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 13.78%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.


USBOX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
2.94%
6M
2.22%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
13.78%

PRWCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
4.25%
6M
3.96%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
2.94%15.77%17.99%29.20%-16.25%16.50%18.06%31.18%-1.97%28.49%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
4.25%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and PRWCX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1987

0.80

The correlation between USBOX and PRWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USBOX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX
USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USBOXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.94

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

8.15

-3.35

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBOXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.67%

-41.77%

-23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-6.32%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-15.96%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.42%

-17.07%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

-26.86%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-1.84%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.08%

-3.33%

-13.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

1.50%

+1.78%

Volatility

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.80%. This indicates that USBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBOXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.80%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

6.45%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

7.80%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

12.79%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

12.73%

+4.42%

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

USBOX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.34%, more than PRWCX's 8.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.45%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
28.34%29.17%8.71%4.37%14.55%0.88%7.47%19.65%15.43%6.92%6.19%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


USBOX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USBOX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to PRWCX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USBOX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer