PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAI vs. PTNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAI vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 13.51% return.


USAI

1D
1.47%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
23.98%
6M
21.70%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*

PTNQ

1D
-0.52%
1M
8.66%
YTD
13.51%
6M
12.12%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAI vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
23.98%0.69%43.99%14.21%19.82%37.10%-15.10%21.63%-17.31%3.69%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
13.51%7.18%15.47%34.65%-16.00%13.16%29.38%24.00%8.51%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between USAI and PTNQ is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017

0.29

The correlation between USAI and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USAI vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USAI
PTNQ

Energy

97.8%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

5.3%

Industrials

-

4.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.2%

Energy

USAI
97.8%
PTNQ
0.5%

Utilities

USAI
2.1%
PTNQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

USAI

-

PTNQ
1.1%

Communication Services

USAI

-

PTNQ
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USAI

-

PTNQ
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

USAI

-

PTNQ
4.8%

Financial Services

USAI

-

PTNQ
0.3%

Healthcare

USAI

-

PTNQ
5.3%

Industrials

USAI

-

PTNQ
4.3%

Real Estate

USAI

-

PTNQ
0.1%

Technology

USAI

-

PTNQ
53.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAI vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAI
USAI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
USAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAI vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAIPTNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.72

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

9.24

-3.62

USAI vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAI and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAIPTNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.06

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.92

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.81

-0.30

Drawdowns

USAI vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than PTNQ's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and PTNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAIPTNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.25%

-28.07%

-37.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-11.76%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

-14.19%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.68%

-18.47%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-0.72%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-5.69%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.46%

+0.53%

Volatility

USAI vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) at 4.64%. This indicates that USAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAIPTNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

4.64%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

11.47%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

15.56%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

12.89%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

16.37%

+10.94%

USAI vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAI vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than PTNQ's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.78%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
4.13%5.03%3.62%4.99%5.41%6.15%7.67%6.50%5.56%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAI and PTNQ have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAI has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to PTNQ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

On 5-year performance, USAI leads with 18.67% vs 11.75% for PTNQ. On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PTNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USAI has performed better with a 18.67% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.

USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.78% for PTNQ.

USAI is categorized as Energy Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. USAI tracks American Energy Independence Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USAI and 0.65% for PTNQ.

PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAI and PTNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer